Cùng Cđộ ẩm Nang Tiếng Anh tham khảo nội dung bài viết “Theoretical framework là gì” dưới nhé!

As a law researcher, I always have the feeling that these three are the same. Therefore, I want khổng lồ learn from your experiences in this area of retìm kiếm. The concise answers & comments here will be of immense help to lớn novice & up coming scholars.Quý khách hàng đang xem: Theoretical Framework Là Gì

Why empirical reviews is basically comparison between literatures…it can be state based comparison in government or culture base in cultural comparison.

Bạn đang xem: Theoretical framework là gì


Xem thêm:

A conceptual analysis may be the same as a theoretical analysis, but this category allows for more flexibility và less rigour. In essence, it’s the first step in analyzing an idea và may be floated for the purpose of stimulating feedback.These publication categories overlap (they are not mutually exclusive) và journal editors may define them in their own distinctive sầu ways.


1) those that are part of the retìm kiếm process (i.e., after deciding on a retìm kiếm question one looks at previous related retìm kiếm khổng lồ see not only what the current state of research is but also what methods, experimental designs, etc., were used)I’ve sầu seen papers contain both “theoretical analysis” & “conceptual analysis” in the title, as in they can be fairly indistinguishable. However, ‘theoretical analysis’ can refer khổng lồ an actual analysis of empirical data obtained through experiments but with a focus on theory rather than application (see e.g., A Theoretical Analysis of Feature Pooling in Visual Recognition http://machinelearning.wustl.edu/mlpapers/paper_files/icml2010_BoureauPL10.pdf). While “literature review” is in everything from retìm kiếm methods dictionaries/encyclopedias & textbooks lớn scholarship in the philosophy of science, “theoretical analysis” is not (at least not to refer khổng lồ some specific type of academic output or methodological approach). Within certain meta-theoretical frameworks (grounded theory) và certain methodological approaches within particular fields (e.g., qualitative retìm kiếm in which thematic and/or content analysis is a necessary part of analyzing open-response data, interview data, & other non-quantitative sầu data), one finds conceptual analysis used more regularly in a specific sense, but for the most part these terms can refer to lớn any non-quantitative analysis. They vị not, in general, have sầu the kind of specific senses that “literature review” has.–

Bài viết liên quan

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *